W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2003

Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:24:30 -0400
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <3E29F9F7-ED19-11D7-9586-0003934BEBF0@w3.org>


Le lundi, 22 sep 2003, à 11:08 America/Montreal, Dan Connolly a écrit :
> You aren't allowed to guess the nature of a resource from
> (one of) its URI(s) *alone*.
> You _are_ allowed to take the URI plus published policies
> and learn things about the nature of the resource that way.

Would it be useful to have an ontology of schemes, uri and meaning as a 
possible way for an automatic agent to learn about the nature of the 
resources and to adopt a behaviour corresponding to this nature.




--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 22 September 2003 12:25:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:21 GMT