- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 00:00:18 +0200
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
* Sandro Hawke wrote: >> >> > http://www.w3.org/1999/xslt >> >> http://www.w3.org/1999/XSLT/Transform >> > http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform >> >> And now let's try to type the RDF Namespace URI Reference... > >What would you like it to do? I just wonder why W3C has no Namespace URI Reference policy that ensures that these are easy to remember and easy to use by the community. Some contain a reference to a year which is sometimes the year of publication of the first draft, the latest draft, the recommendation, sometimes they contain a month, sometimes they do not, sometimes a day, some have version numbers, some have dashes, some use all-lowercase, some use all-uppercase, some use mixed or camel case, some have a trailing slash, some have a trailing hash, some technologies use different namespaces for different versions, some use the same, ... I neither understand why P3P is at /P3P/, RDF at /RDF/, PICS at /PICS/ QA at /QA/, WAI at /WAI/ but TAG at /2001/tag/ on the W3C web site, just as if anyone cared that the TAG had been formed in 2001; W3C URI design seems more and more stupid.
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2003 18:00:32 UTC