W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2003

Re: Action: Redraft 4.10.2 to include some good practice notes

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 14:46:34 -0400
To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF0E9DA96E.EF451720-ON85256D96.0066B595@lotus.com>

Norm writes:

>> The "fully qualified" form of an XML element or attribute name is the
  combination of its namespace URI and its local name.

I note that the Namespaces in XML 1.1 PR Draft introduces the term 
"expanded name" for what I take to be the same purpose [1].  FWIW, the 
SOAP Adjuncts spec did its best to anticipate this usage in at least one 
place.  Might it make sense to adopt the term "expanded name" across the 
board to refer to {uri,local_name}?

Noah

[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2003/05/PR-xml-names11/#dt-expname
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part2/#edgelabels

------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2003 14:46:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:20 GMT