W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2003

Re: on "Versioning XML Languages"

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:28:10 -0700
Cc: "'Dare Obasanjo'" <dareo@microsoft.com>, "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>
To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
Message-Id: <7967BDB4-05DA-11D8-9BFD-000A95A51C9E@textuality.com>

On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 11:34  AM, David Orchard wrote:

> I'd like to offer the way I'd like this to play out:
> 1. The TAG produces a finding on extensibility/versioning that is 
> schema
> neutral
> 2. The TAG produces a finding or a Note on how to achieve said 
> extensibility
> in xml schema.  XML Schema is after all the annointed schema language 
> for
> XML by the W3C.  And customers/specs are using it right now.
> 3. Some group of people (myself/TAG as a body/interested parties) 
> comment on
> what XML Schema could do in v1.1 to make extensibility and versioning
> easier.

I'm OK with this approach. -Tim
Received on Friday, 24 October 2003 00:28:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:40 UTC