On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 11:34 AM, David Orchard wrote: > I'd like to offer the way I'd like this to play out: > 1. The TAG produces a finding on extensibility/versioning that is > schema > neutral > 2. The TAG produces a finding or a Note on how to achieve said > extensibility > in xml schema. XML Schema is after all the annointed schema language > for > XML by the W3C. And customers/specs are using it right now. > 3. Some group of people (myself/TAG as a body/interested parties) > comment on > what XML Schema could do in v1.1 to make extensibility and versioning > easier. I'm OK with this approach. -TimReceived on Friday, 24 October 2003 00:28:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:49 GMT