- From: Walden Mathews <waldenm@optonline.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:22:34 -0400
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>, 'Dan Connolly' <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
: It seems clear to me the intent. Perhaps the spec could have been written a : bit better: : "whose generic identifier is not declared is mapped" -> "whose generic : identifier is not declared must be mapped". : : I believe that "is" statements are the equivalent of must. The presence of the language: "the installed base of HTML user agents" makes the "must" interpretation infeasible. Would the spec be requiring something of an "installed base"? Walden
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2003 14:22:31 UTC