- From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:29:39 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Hmmm... either that screws up the use of qnames in attribute values even more, which makes any alternative xml-validatable RDF syntax look pretty longwinded with URIs, or it is a nail in the coffin for c14n, which already has trouble with xml:lang and xml:base. Suppose we use single quotes around qnames and double quotes around everything else ;-) tim On Nov 15, 2003, at 1:45, Dan Connolly wrote: > > Norm, as we discussed in the hall, our finding on qnames in attr vals > should note that c14n loses the namespace bindings. > > Daveo noted that we security has had trouble with this. > > The Rdf wg ran into this when discussing equality of literals. I > gather it comes up in xquery too. > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2003 10:31:07 UTC