Re: Draft revised text for 2.2 on ambiguity/indirect identification

On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 13:05, Mark Baker wrote:
[...]
> Was httpRange-14 resolved and nobody informed me? 8-)

No; and in fact the text you're responding to wasn't adopted
either, as I recall.

I think we made a relevant decision that involved chopping
a bunch of text out of this part of the document.

Please stay tuned for more details from the record.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Monday, 17 November 2003 23:49:12 UTC