W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > November 2003

[Agenda] 10 Nov 2003 TAG teleconf (Meeting planning, XMLVersioning-41, Arch Doc update)

From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 13:15:23 -0500
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1068228923.1891.30.camel@seabright>
Hello,

The agenda for the TAG's 10 Nov 2003 teleconference is
available as HTML [1] and as text below.

 _ Ian

[1] http://www.w3.org/2003/11/10-tag

=======================================================
                 Agenda of 10 November 2003 TAG teleconference

1. Administrative (15min)

    1. Welcome, Roll Call.
    2. Accept the minutes of the [8]27 Oct teleconference?
       Completed action IJ: Ping DO and PC for help filling in the
       blanks.
    3. Accept the minutes of the [9]3 Nov teleconference?
    4. Accept this [10]agenda?
    5. Accept draft summary for Oct?
    6. Next meeting: 15-17 Nov 2003 TAG ftf meeting in Japan

      [8] http://www.w3.org/2003/10/27-tag-summary.html
      [9] http://www.w3.org/2003/11/03-tag-summary.html
     [10] http://www.w3.org/2003/11/03-tag.html

  1.1 TAG ftf meeting at Tech Plenary?

   Confirm intention for TAG F2F Monday/Tuesday of Tech Plenary week

  1.2 TAG Nov face-to-face meeting agenda

    1. [11]Meeting and agenda page
    2. Agenda outline:
         1. Review of Architecture Document. 12 November version?
         2. Last call decision, timetable, plan.
         3. Breakout sessions to address must do items.
         4. [12]deepLinking-25
              1. Completed action IJ 2003/11/03: Invite Janet to TAG's
                 ftf meeting in Japan.
         5. Other [13]issues...

     [11] http://www.w3.org/2003/11/15-tag-mtg.html
     [12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#deepLinking-25
     [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html

  1.3 TAG update at Nov 2003 AC meeting.

    1. Action CL 2003/10/27: incorporate input on AC slides and produce
       another draft.

2. Technical (75min)

    1. Review of Architecture Document writing assignments
    2. XML Versioning
    3. deepLinking-25

  2.1 Review of Architecture Document writing assignments

   Comments on [14]27 Oct 2003 WD of the Arch Doc?

     [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/webarch-20031027/

   Editor's expectations: Review a todo list (not yet available) that
   will be incorporated into an Editor's Draft to be made available 12
   November.

   Recent action items:

   Ian

         1. Action IJ 2003/10/08: Starting from DO's diagram, create a
            diagram where the relationships and terms are linked back to
            the context where defined. Ensure that the relationships are
            in fact used in the narrative; any gaps identified? With DO,
            work on term relationship diagram.

   Chris

         1. Action CL 2003/07/21: Discuss and propose improved wording of
            language regarding SVG spec in bulleted list in 2.5.1.

   Norm

         1. Action NW 2003/10/08: Revise QName finding. We will also add
            those two good practice notes to section 2:
              1. If you use Qnames, provide a mapping to URIs.
              2. Don't define an attribute that can take either a URI or
                 a Qname since they are not syntactically
                 distinguishable."

   Roy

         1. Action RF 2003/10/08: Explain "identifies" in RFC 2396.

   TBL

         1. Action TBL 2003/07/14: Suggest changes to section about
            extensibility related to "when to tunnel".

   DC

         1. Action DC 2003/07/21: Propose language for section 2.8.5
            showing examples of freenet and other systems. Progress; see
            [15]URISchemes/freenet

     [15] http://esw.w3.org/topic/UriSchemes_2ffreenet

  2.2 XML Versioning (XMLVersioning-41)

   [16]XMLVersioning-41

     [16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#XMLVersioning-41

   Current draft is [17]3 Oct 2003 finding
    1. Action IJ 2003/11/03: ([18]Issue XMLVersioning-41) Review XML
       Versioning text, propose a shortened form to DO and NW for their
       consideration, including good practice notes. See [19]proposal
       from Ian.

     [17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/versioning-20031003
     [18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#XMLVersioning-41
     [19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Nov/0020.html

  2.3 Review of 3023-related actions

    1. Should we open an issue or reopen a TAG issue?
    2. Action CL 2003/10/27: Draft XML mime type thingy with Murata-san
    3. Action TBL/DC 2003/10/08: Talk to the Architecture Domain Lead.

     _________________________________________________________________

   The TAG does not expect to cover these issues

  2.5 Findings

   See also [20]TAG findings home page.
     * [21]whenToUseGet-7: Finding: [22]URIs, Addressability, and the use
       of HTTP GET and POST
     * [23]contentPresentation-26: Draft finding: [24]Separation of
       semantic and presentational markup, to the extent possible, is
       architecturally sound
     * [25]contentTypeOverride-24: 9 July 2003 draft of [26]Client
       handling of MIME headers
         1. Completed action RF 2003/09/15: Proposed substitute text in
            light of [27]previous comments on charset param. ([28]Done)
         2. [29]Comments from Philipp Hoschka about usability issues when
            user involved in error correction. Is there a new Voice spec
            out we can point to for example behavior?
         3. [30]Comments from Chris Lilley
         4. Lots of [31]comments from Martin Duerst
     * [32]metadataInURI-31

     [20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings/
     [21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#whenToUseGet-7
     [22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/whenToUseGet-20030922
     [23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26
     [24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/contentPresentation-26-20030630.html
     [25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentTypeOverride-24
     [26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect.html
     [27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0051.html
     [28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Sep/0043.html
     [29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Jul/0076.html
     [30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0113.html
     [31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Sep/0108.html
     [32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31

    2.2.1 Expected new findings

     * [33]siteData-36
     * [34]abstractComponentRefs-37
       Completed action IJ 2003/11/03: Publish DO's latest draft in
       finding format ([35]Done)

     [33] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#siteData-36
     [34] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
     [35] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Nov/0008.html

     _________________________________________________________________


    Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
    Last modified: $Date: 2003/11/07 18:14:18 $


-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447

Received on Friday, 7 November 2003 13:15:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:40 UTC