W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2003

[abstractComponentRefs-37] Definition of abstract components with namespace names and frag ids

From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: 25 Mar 2003 11:43:24 -0500
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1048610604.10362.209.camel@seabright>

Hello,

At their 24 Mar 2003 teleconf [1], the TAG accepted
this issue [2].

 - Ian

[1] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/24-tag-summary#abstractComponentRefs-37
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#abstractComponentRefs-37

=============================================================


Is it wise to use fragment IDs for identifying abstract components
within a namespace, even though it is the most natural and convenient
mechanism? Is there another mechanism that would be preferable?



Raised by, on behalf of
        Jonathan Marsh, WSDL WG
Concerning
        Namespaces in XML, WSDL
Background and related
              * rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6, namespaceDocument-8
        
State (Raised, Accepted, Declined, Resolved, etc.)
              * 3 Feb 2003 Raised
              * 24 Mar 2003 Accepted
              * 24 Mar 2003 Assigned
        
Discussion history
        24 Mar 2003
Assigned to
        David Orchard
Resolution summary
        None.


________________________________________________________________________
-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2003 11:43:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:16 GMT