Sandro Hawke wrote: > ... > It's interesting to note that "Site" here, as I think you've described > it, is an RDF type or RDFS/OWL class. Each resource is either part of > the site or it's not, and the ones which are part of the site have > certain common characteristics. This sounds like a Rich Site Summary or RDF Site Summary mechanism... > ... So one might call the HTTP header > "Resource-Type", in nice parallel to "Content-Type". In this case we > would certainly expect people to define their own Resource-Types and > make available information about them on the web (ie in these site > meta-data information documents). I've seen this proposal float around before but I can't remember where. Paul PrescodReceived on Friday, 21 March 2003 16:31:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:01:57 GMT