W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2003

Re: Comment on xmlIDsemantics32

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 19:38:56 +0200
Message-ID: <54532790902.20030614193856@w3.org>
To: www-tag@w3.org, "Glenn A. Adams" <glenn@xfsi.com>

On Saturday, June 14, 2003, 4:45:00 PM, Glenn wrote:



GAA> In the section "What is the problem?" of [1], I suggest scoping the
GAA> statements that are made to the XML definition of validity, and not
GAA> an absolute definition.

GAA> For example, in the first paragraph after the example, the phrase
GAA> "is not valid and cannot be validated" is true only with respect
GAA> to the XML specification's definition of valid and validatable
GAA> in the use of an XML DTD. The statement is not necessarily true
GAA> in contexts that don't soley depend on the XML definition of validity.

What other definitions were you thinking of?

GAA> Regards,
GAA> Glenn

GAA> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/xmlIDsemantics-32.html
 



-- 
 Chris                            mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 14 June 2003 13:39:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:38 UTC