- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 13 Jun 2003 08:03:46 -0500
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Cc: WWW-Tag <www-tag@w3.org>
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 23:51, Tim Bray wrote: > I dislike it because it treats nature and purpose asymmetrically. What suggests that they should be symmetric? > > a) of Dan's point that your declarations do not bind appropriately to > > the actual resource being described > > I disagree. I claim that rfc2396.txt has a nature (.../text/plain) and > a purpose (...#normative-reference). It's a normative reference *from something*. That it is text/plain is independent of its relationship to anything else. But that it is a normative reference isn't. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 13 June 2003 09:03:27 UTC