W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2003

Re: RDDL again

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 19:28:59 +0200
Message-ID: <3EDCDADB.4040209@expway.fr>
To: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Cc: WWW-Tag <www-tag@w3.org>


Paul Prescod wrote:
> I strongly feel that RDDL documents MUST be able to declare what 
> namespace they are describing and SHOULD do so. There are two reasons 
> for this.

I completely agree. How about using xml:base for this?

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Research Engineer, Expway        http://expway.fr/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488

Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2003 13:29:06 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ian B. Jacobs: "[Agenda] 9 June 2003 TAG teleconf (Arch Doc, Findings next steps, Issues near closing)"
Previous message: Paul Prescod: "Re: RDDL again"
In reply to: Paul Prescod: "Re: RDDL again"
Next in thread: Dan Connolly: "Re: RDDL again"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:01:58 GMT