Norm, I strongly agree with Roy on this too (though I'd note that he seems to be assuming that "document" = "bag-o-bits" rather than "timbl:document"). But I wanted to respond to one of your points anyhow. On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 05:08:11PM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote: > 6. Just like a "FOO" can't be simultaneously a car and a cat, > http://norman.walsh.name/ can't simultaneously be a person and a > document. Perhaps, but you don't know until you also know that persons and documents are disjoint (i.e. you're making a closed world assumption). Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.caReceived on Friday, 25 July 2003 07:46:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:01:59 GMT