Sandro Hawke wrote: > My glimmer of hope in all this is "303 See Other" redirects. It seems > reasonable to say that if you get a 303 response during a dereference > attempt then the URI *does*not*denote*a*response*point*. This gives > us a coherent universe of response points and other things (like > chairs), without resorting to using hash marks. So you are going to conclude from one instance of a 303 that this will be the behavior for all time? Especially since RFC2616 says "The 303 response MUST NOT be cached." -TimReceived on Thursday, 17 July 2003 17:14:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:48 GMT