- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 16 Jul 2003 17:05:09 -0500
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 16:41, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > Hey guys, I was explaining why the TAG did not take up the issue. You can say why you didn't advocate that the TAG take up the issue, but it's not your place to speak for the group. I let it go when you wrote "The TAG has simply required that WSA do no harm to the visibility of the existing Web ..." when in fact the TAG has made no such decision. But you continue to put words into the groups mouth, so now I'm asking you to stop. > By definition, this discussion is over, By what definition? We didn't decide *anything*; we didn't decide to accept this issue, and we didn't decide that there is no issue here. Until we decide to accept an issue, we have no obligation to resolve it (or discuss it or anything else). But that doesn't mean folks shouldn't clarify their request that we add an issue. In the past, we actually have decided not to discuss certain topics; in at least a few cases, we did that by adding it to the issues list with a "declined" state. http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xformsReview-4 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#uncefactLiaison-5 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#soapRPCURI-11 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2003 18:05:10 UTC