- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 15:00:31 -0400
- To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, <www-tag@w3.org>
David Orchard wrote: > > I'm muddled on this. I can see pros and cons for having different terms for > the resource and the representation. I think the 80/20 point is to call > them the same thing, though for completeness I expect that people would want > to differentiate. > > I feel httprange-14 footsteps... > This is httpRange-14 knee deep in mud. It is this particular issue that made up my mind about httpRange-14 i.e. if HTTP URIs may only identify network documents, then are you saying that http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema is a 'network document'? ... yes I know the 'conceptual work' argument but I maintain that the difference between "XML Schema" and "the XML Schema specification" is the same as the difference between an XML Namespace and its namespace document. 80/20? that seems like saying that if we say 0 = 1 = 2, then there are 8 numbers between 0 -> 9 i.e. 80% of the actual number. Lite but less filling :-))) Jonathan
Received on Friday, 11 July 2003 15:00:40 UTC