W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2003

[Agenda] 27 Jan 2003 TAG teleconference (arch doc, URIs, IRIs)

From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 17:35:31 +0100
Message-ID: <3E3019D3.7090906@w3.org>
To: www-tag@w3.org

Hello,

The agenda of the TAG's 27 Jan 2003 teleconf is available
as HTML [1] and as text below.

   - Ian

[1] http://www.w3.org/2003/01/27-tag

  =========================================================


                    Agenda for 27 Jan 2003 TAG teleconference

    Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of
    business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.

1. Administrative (20min)

     1. Confirm Chair (SW) and Scribe (IJ).
     2. Accept [7]20 Jan minutes?
     3. Accept this [8]agenda?
     4. Next meeting: 3 Feb (short)

       [7] http://www.w3.org/2003/01/20-tag-summary.html
       [8] http://www.w3.org/2003/01/20-tag.html

   1.1 Meeting planning

      * Next TAG ftf: 6-7 Feb 2003 in Irvine, CA (USA)
           + [9]Draft agenda
      * Nov 2003: Face-to-face meeting in Japan on 17 Nov?

       [9] http://www.w3.org/2003/02/06-tag-agenda.html

2. Technical (70min)

   2.1 Findings in progress, architecture document

    See also: [10]findings.
     1. Findings in progress:
          1. [11]deepLinking-25
               1. Action TB 2002/09/09: Revise "[12]Deep Linking" in light
                  of [13]9 Sep minutes.
          2. [14]URIEquivalence-15
               1. TB's "[15]How to Compare Uniform Resource Identifiers"
                  draft finding.
               2. Action TBL 2003/01/20: Send email to uri@w3.org
                  requesting terminology change (regarding definition of
                  "URI").
               3. Action TB: Before Feb 2003, produce a new draft of
                  [16]How to Compare Uniform Resource Identifiers that
                  incorporates comments from DC and TAG.
     2. [17]6 Dec 2002 Editor's Draft of Arch Doc:
          1. Next TR page draft? IJ proposes after ftf meeting.
          2. Action CL 2002/09/25: Redraft section 3 based on resolutions
             of [18]18 Nov 2002 ftf meeting.
          3. Complete review of TBs [19]proposed principles CP9, CP10 and
             CP11

      [10] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
      [11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#deepLinking-25
      [12] http://www.textuality.com/tag/DeepLinking.html
      [13] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/09-tag-summary
      [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#URIEquivalence-15
      [15] http://www.textuality.com/tag/uri-comp-2.html
      [16] http://www.textuality.com/tag/uri-comp-2.html
      [17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/webarch-20021206
      [18] http://www.w3.org/2002/11/18-tag-summary#archdoc
      [19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Nov/0107.html

   2.2 Priority issues

     1. httpRange-14:
          1. [20]Request to establish the relationship between URIs and
             Resources is many to many; from Bill de Hora.
     2. [21]IRIEverywhere-27
          1. Action MD and CL 2002/11/18: Write up text about
             IRIEverywhere-27 for spec writers to include in their spec.
          2. Action CL 2002/11/18: Write up finding for IRIEverywhere-27
             (from TB and TBL, a/b/c), to include MD's text. Process with
             IJ; awaiting comments from MD
     3. [22]binaryXML-30
          1. Action CL 2002/12/02: Write up problem statement about binary
             XML; send to www-tag.
     4. [23]xmlProfiles-29
          1. See email from Chris on [24]options for ID
          2. See email from NW (TAG-only) on [25]ID attributes.
          3. See [26]comments from Paul Grosso to treat xml:id as separate
             spec.
          4. See [27]NW summary.
     5. [28]namespaceDocument-8
          1. Action PC, TB 2003/01/13: Write up a Working Draft that
             recommends a data format for namespace docs (not compulsory)
             and that such a document should follow the Rec track process.
             The initial content of the document should be taken from the
             RDDL challenge proposals; they are isomorphic in tecnical
             content. Please include drawbacks in the draft.
          2. Please read [29]NW summary of the following proposals:
               1. [30]RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray.
               2. [31]RDDL Proposal from Chris Wilper
               3. [32]RDDL Proposal from TBL
               4. [33]RDDL Proposal from Jonathan Borden
               5. [34]RDDL Proposal from Micah Dubinko
               6. [35]RDDL Proposal from Sandro Hawke
               7. See also [36]proposal from Garrett Wilson
     6. [37]fragmentInXML-28 : Use of fragment identifiers in XML.
          1. Connection to content negotiation?
          2. Connection to opacity of URIs?

      [20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0301.html
      [21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#IRIEverywhere-27
      [22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#binaryXML-30
      [23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlProfiles-29
      [24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0025.html
      [25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Jan/0013.html
      [26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0024.html
      [27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0178.html
      [28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#namespaceDocument-8
      [29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0004.html
      [30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Dec/0048.html
      [31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Dec/0056.html
      [32] http://www.w3.org/2002/11/rddl/
      [33] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Dec/0099
      [34] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Dec/0180.html
      [35] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Dec/0232.html
      [36] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0223.html
      [37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#fragmentInXML-28

      _________________________________________________________________


     Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
     Last modified: $Date: 2003/01/23 16:33:08 $



-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2003 11:35:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:15 GMT