Re: argument from authority considered pointless

On Wednesday 22 January 2003 06:18 pm, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Thanks Roy.  I appreciate the response.  Maybe Sandro should answer this
> because I think the problem is the formalism requires the application
> to perform an action (identification) with the URI and that KR assumes
> a one to one mapping of name to identified object, not a potential n-set:

This is likely a significant part of the problem... but I would argue that 
this is more a problem with KR than names (despite being generally sympathic 
to the issue).

Getting back to David's post... it seems like the whole reason for RDF and 
SemWeb is to establish a context in which names can unambiguously be 
interpreted.