W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2003

Re: On subsetting XML...

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:52:27 -0500
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <87k7h325hw.fsf@nwalsh.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> was heard to say:
|>Unfortunately, a number of user communities have expressed a need to
|>work with only a subset of XML. The TAG is concerned that if these
|>needs are not addressed quickly (and centrally), a number of slightly
|>different XML subsets will arise and if this trend continues, the
|>stability of XML as the basis of a whole range of technologies could
|>be jeopardized.
|
| These communities are wrong. They should be told not to subset XML
| syntax as an architectural principle. If they choose to do so anyway,
| then the W3C should not bless this behavior. It is an interoperability
| disaster.

Honestly, that would be my preferred position in an ideal world. But
this isn't an ideal world and there's plenty of evidence that there
are user communities determined to subset. So I think the best
compromise for interoperability is to make sure there's one subset
they can all refer to instead of having eleven different ones.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM    | Well-being is attained by little and little,
XML Standards Architect | and nevertheless it is no little thing
Web Tech. and Standards | itself.--Zen of Citium
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE+KBirOyltUcwYWjsRAvawAKCkhioItuhHFJpLGpaSFu3axV8ZkQCeOtYf
aSuq/gIudD+BfhPOePJ5CL4=
=Z+Io
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 17 January 2003 09:53:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:15 GMT