- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:09:15 +0100
- To: www-tag@w3.org, "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- CC: "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>
On Tuesday, February 11, 2003, 10:59:09 PM, Claude wrote: BCLL> From: Dan Connolly [mailto:connolly@w3.org] >>Suggestions for improving that text are more >>interesting, at this point, than picking >>up random points out of the context of the meeting. BCLL> The only statement I don't understand is: BCLL> "Persistence; there is lots of redundancy" BCLL> and that only because I don't understand the BCLL> relationship of persistence and redundancy. In the source of that document is a comment (from me that says much the same thing - no clue what that is supposed to mean. Coments are however not preserved, it seems, in generating the html (which is okay according to the xml spec, but unfortunate). BCLL> I can't make a suggestion for a change because BCLL> I don't understand the point, so I won't suggest BCLL> one or post an issue. It may be the kind of text BCLL> that benefits from annotation at a later date; eg, the BCLL> excellent Annotated XML Specification that Tim BCLL> Bray provided for XML 1.0. I propose that unless someone speaks up and explains, it we just drop that bullet point. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Friday, 28 February 2003 13:09:28 UTC