On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 12:49, Tim Bray wrote: [...] > Then you introduce a new HTTP header as TBL suggested. I'd call it > "Web-site" or just "Site". Any server could, but need not, include this > header in a response to a GET or HEAD request. > > You could easily include this in the <head> of HTML documents along the > lines of > > <meta http-equiv="Web-site" content="http://example.com/site" /> [...] Hmm... at a glance, I like it. I'll have to think it over. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Thursday, 27 February 2003 15:30:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:01:57 GMT