- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:58:54 +0100
- To: "<Patrick.Stickler" <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo@agfa.com>, timbl@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org, www-tag-request@w3.org
[...] > > > Jos, what if I have a URI <http://example.com/foo> and nothing > > > more, and want to know what it means and want to ask the server > > > http://example.com to tell me. How do I do that? > > > > > > That is what this thread is about. How to obtain a description of > > > a resource when all one has is the URI denoting it and *nothing* > > > else. > > > > Well, on the SW that would be a wrong premis > > (so everything could come out) as you always > > have at least some triples in which that URI > > is used... > > Right, but that's the point. We're not "on" the SW yet. The discussion > is about the interface between the Web and the Semantic Web and > how the Web architecture should/must be extended to allow for > obtaining knowledge from web authorities about resources having > URIs grounded in that authority. > > Once you have that information, and are doing SW things with it, > then the Web is out of scope. Well Patrick, to the contrary! That was the (erased) point with <uri-of-doc> log:semantics _:x which comes with builtin GET of current Web uri-of-doc and above triple is a piece of a formala which is written on a document which is also on the actual Web. I really fail to see ANY problem here... -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 15:59:42 UTC