RE: Proposed issue: site metadata hook (slight variation)

> > > IFF you want to posit another URI to denote that body of 
> knowledge,
> > > you should be able to, but the architecture should not demand it.
> > 
> > Well, I think we've reached an impasse here.  I think the 
> architecture
> > should absolutely demand it.  
> 
> Then I guess we're going to have to figure out a way to convert
> all the blank nodes in every RDF graph to URIrefs...

I was speaking specifically about the "document" that would be returned
when doing an MGET (or GET+Meta:); that document should have a distinct
URI.