W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2003

RE: Proposed issue: site metadata hook (slight variation)

From: Jeffrey Winter <JeffreyWinter@crd.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:58:46 -0500
Message-ID: <3A9933B568A24543B6AD9E02C7E6ADA0C15CE4@moe.crd.com>
To: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, <miles@milessabin.com>, <www-tag@w3.org>


> > > IFF you want to posit another URI to denote that body of 
> knowledge,
> > > you should be able to, but the architecture should not demand it.
> > 
> > Well, I think we've reached an impasse here.  I think the 
> architecture
> > should absolutely demand it.  
> 
> Then I guess we're going to have to figure out a way to convert
> all the blank nodes in every RDF graph to URIrefs...

I was speaking specifically about the "document" that would be returned
when doing an MGET (or GET+Meta:); that document should have a distinct
URI.
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 10:58:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:16 GMT