W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2003

Re: [Minutes] 6-7 Feb 2003 TAG ftf meeting

From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:50:08 -0600
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20030211104514.00b692b0@172.27.10.30>
To: www-tag@w3.org

[Yes, this is really about the minutes!]

At 20:35 2003 02 10 -0500, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:

>[1] http://www.w3.org/2003/02/06-tag-summary
>-- 

In [1], there is a section that reads as follows:

 xmlIDSemantics-32 : How should the problem of identifying ID semantics
 in XML languages be addressed in the absence of a DTD?

 Issues fragmentInXML-28 and xmlIDSemantics-32

 [Ian] 

     TB: I think they are related. If you are solving the ID problem,
     you need to also decide how to solve the frag id problem.
     PC: I am willing to be owner of 32

 On xmlProfiles-29 
     PC: Henry Thompson asks what the TAG wants to happen. They are looking
     for more details than we have given them. 
     DC: Liam Quin has the ball on this; he has accepted this. 

The link underneath "fragmentInXML-28" is to 
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#xmlProfiles-29

So I'm wondering if the text or the link is wrong.  As written,
it looks like TB is saying fragmentInXML-28 and xmlIDSemantics-32
are related, but I'm guessing the text is wrong and he means to
be saying that xmlProfiles-29 and xmlIDSemantics-32 are related
(to which I disagree, but I'm more interested in getting the minutes
accurate at this point).

paul
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2003 11:57:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:16 GMT