W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2003

FW: [xml-dev] repercussions

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 12:09:08 -0800
To: <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <022201c3c735$21530970$6401a8c0@beasys.com>

I though the TAG would be interested in one stakeholders perspective on the
utility of a particular TAG finding.

Cheers,
Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@datapower.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 5:12 AM
To: Simon St.Laurent
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] repercussions


> It's good to confirm that issues derided as mere aesthetic blotches are
> capable of causing real problems for sophisticated tools - and users.

We just went through a fairly contentious telecon for WS-Security that
decided to remove all QNAME's from the WSSE spec, replacing them with
URI's.  The usual arguments against them took place; the main counter-
balance against removing them was (unstated) installed base.  BTW, the
recent TAG finding was taken as a strong argument against QNAME's in
content.
	/r$

 --
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html


-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
Received on Saturday, 20 December 2003 15:10:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:23 GMT