W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2003

RE: webarch version number

From: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 14:46:43 -0800
Message-ID: <33D970235519324D988AFFDE7EA2E24C4C4F0C@RED-MSG-41.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, <www-tag@w3.org>

I will concur with any numbering selected.  

In fact I expect no matter what we choose we will get Last Call comments
to change it.

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 
mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com

  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of
> Norman Walsh
> Sent: December 4, 2003 5:17 PM
> To: www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: Re: webarch version number
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> / Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> was heard to say:
> | On Dec 4, 2003, at 12:24 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> |
> |> I forgot to mention this at the meeting, but I really don't like
> |> the version 1.0 at the top of the document.  The technology is at
> |> least version 3.2 by now, the description is hovering on the edge
> |> of moving to 4.0, and the document is at 1st edition.  Any one of
> |> those numbers is better than 1.0.
> |
> | I would agree.  How about calling
> |
> | "Architecture of the World Wide Web: 2003"
> |
> | Failing that, "First Edition" is good.
> 
> +1, with a slight preference for "First Edition" as there's a
precedent
> for subsequent editions. But if anyone feels strongly, I'm happy to
> vote "concur".
> 
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
> 
> - --
> Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems,
Inc.
> NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
> Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
> reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8
<http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
> 
> iD8DBQE/z7J2OyltUcwYWjsRApRcAJ9w8KSbpNHmv8u7hfGj5hZ9AD8aZgCfal37
> 2uG5wSdbx0ZQw+gRVTTb9IU=
> =dFzi
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 4 December 2003 17:47:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:23 GMT