- From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 17:30:52 -0000
- To: "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>, "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Dan, Thanks... I concur with the changes wrt to my action items. Also in similar vein: > > 8. Negotiations with WGs for last call: > > ... > > 4. HTML/IJ done is also waiting for a response - ie. not done. Regards Stuart -- > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Connolly [mailto:connolly@w3.org] > Sent: 2 December 2003 17:10 > To: Ian B. Jacobs > Cc: www-tag@w3.org > Subject: Re: [Minutes] 1 Dec 2003 TAG teleconf (Arch Doc > walkthrough, action review) > > > > On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 07:51, Ian B. Jacobs wrote: > [...] > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2003/12/01-tag-summary.html > > > 2. Accepted the minutes of the [9]15-17 Nov ftf meeting > > pls add: > Abstaining: TBL, PC > > > 6. Video meeting in Feb 2003: > > 1. Action SW/PC 2003/11/10: Explore possibility of > TAG videolink > > TAG distributed meeting in February. > > 7. Tech Plenary > > 1. Completed action SW 2003/11/15: Take to tech plenary > > committee the TAG's proposal.. > > SW: I haven't received a response from the committee yet > > (since they have yet to meet). > > I think Stuart asked for that action to be continued, and > that the meeting agreed. > > > 8. Negotiations with WGs for last call: > > 1. SW/I18N done > > not done, acutally. > > > 2. Schema/PC done. MSM has confirmed. > > 3. SVG/CL done. CL has confirmed. > > 4. HTML/IJ done > > 5. Todo: Voice/SW, XML Core/NW, WSDL/DO > > > > [9] http://www.w3.org/2003/12/15-tag-summary.html > > [10] http://www.w3.org/2003/11/24-tag-summary.html > > [11] http://www.w3.org/2003/12/24-tag.html > > > > 2. Technical (75min) > > [... all the rest looks fine...] > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > >
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2003 12:33:02 UTC