Re: 2.3 URI Ambiguity

On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 11:09:33AM -0500, Walden Mathews wrote:
> When I read the first paragraph above, it seems clear to me that
> the conference organizers are asking for an identifier that identifies
> a mailbox;

I hadn't considered that.  It could be.

> they are not asking for any URI that the attendee feels
> is his/her global identifier.  So in that context, I think maybe the text
> is not suggesting that httpRange-14 is resolved one way or another.
> 
> If that context needs to be made clearer, maybe a tweak is in
> order.  Do you see any light in this direction?

It could be clarified, certainly, but I wonder if the example wouldn't
become too confusing as a result?  Perhaps we should just stick with the
other example.

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca

Received on Monday, 1 December 2003 12:31:09 UTC