W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2003

RE: Review of Rembrance-Day webarch draft

From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:57:08 -0000
Message-ID: <E864E95CB35C1C46B72FEA0626A2E80869A3A0@0-mail-br1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "'Ian B. Jacobs'" <ij@w3.org>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org

Hi Ian,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian B. Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] 
> Sent: 28 November 2003 23:58
> To: Tim Bray
> Cc: www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Review of Rembrance-Day webarch draft
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 17:54, Tim Bray wrote:
> > On Nov 28, 2003, at 2:43 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
> > 
> > > I believe the wording we agreed on is along the lines of
> > > "Must-understand means that markup from an unrecognized 
> namespace is 
> > > treated as an error condition."
> > 
> > Er, that should be just "unrecognized markup" right? -T
> 
> Why, if the namespace is unrecognized then the markup is
> as well (at least I think).

Well yes, but it is also possible to recognise the namespace name and still
not recognise the markup (due to version change/evolution). I "unrecognized
markup" as Tim suggests covers that as well.

>  _ Ian
> 
> Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
> Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447

Cheers

Stuart
Received on Monday, 1 December 2003 11:59:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:22 GMT