W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2003

RE: Grinding to a halt on Issue 27.

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:27:06 +0200
To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@topologi.com>, <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCKEPFHCAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
> Rick Jelliffe
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 3:55 PM
> To: www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Grinding to a halt on Issue 27.
> ...
> In [0a], Julian's posting [0b] is summarized as 'feedback that
> this "upgrade" is
> not without some cost'.  However, that is not what Julian said
> AFAICS. His comment
> is not anti-non-ASCII per se but concerned with namespace comparisons.
> I think this is gist of Rod Fieldings comments: he thinks that
> going all ASCII
> will solve things.
> ...


that's correct. My concerns are/were:

- there is no clear mandate to change this in the XMLNS (!) 1.1 requirements
- it may break code, in particular if IRI allows some ASCII characters which
are commonly used as delimiters *between* namespace names (I assume that
this is going to be fixed)
- the benefit is unclear: if somebody really want's to *refer* to his
namespace using localized characters, he *can* do that. Just use the IRI,
and specify that the actual namespace name is the mapped URI (just like
you'll need to do the same transformation when for instance mapping a IRI to


<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2003 12:27:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:37 UTC