W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2003

RE: Grinding to a halt on Issue 27.

From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:47:49 -0700
Message-ID: <4F4182C71C1FDD4BA0937A7EB7B8B4C108E88FA3@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>, "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>, "WWW-Tag" <www-tag@w3.org> 

> > Seems to me it is in the URI designers choice.  If they want widest
> > possible global appeal, they use ascii.  If they want the widest
> > possible local appeal, they use localization.  This is the ever
present

> Exactly.  I agree that it should be possible for the technology to

Localization and encoding are orthogonal issues.  Did you mean to say
"English/localize" or did you mean to say "ascii/unicode"?  Without
clarification, I am afraid that the above has no meaning whatsoever.
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2003 22:47:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:01:57 GMT