W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2003

Re: internet media types and encoding

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 13:03:33 -0400
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <87wuhxj9ju.fsf@nwalsh.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com> was heard to say:
| At 09:28 2003 04 14 -0700, Tim Bray wrote:
|
|>Norman Walsh wrote:
|>
|>>I think Rick, Chris, Tim, et. al., argue convincingly that the C1
|>>control characters should be excluded from XML 1.1.
|>
|>...
|>
|>>And do what? Issue a finding that says C1 control characters should be
|>>excluded from XML 1.1?
|>
|>I think we're kind of stuck with the C1 chars based on them having been allowed in XML 1.0.  
|
| So now it doesn't sound like, in fact, you were "arguing
| convincingly that the C1 control characters should be
| excluded from XML 1.1."

Yeah, that confused me to. Maybe I was confused to start with. I
thought the topic of discussion was the fact that in XML 1.1 the C1
control chars would have to be NCR'd.

I'm on the fence about allowing the C0's as NCRs.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM    | Pleasure is seldom found where it is sought;
XML Standards Architect | our brightest blazes of gladness are commonly
Web Tech. and Standards | kindled by unexpected sparks.--Dr. Johnson
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE+munlOyltUcwYWjsRAi9sAJ9FAn8mIVW5uq19wRsBvZG5goxm1wCfZDL+
KDnfznh/HBL2mGX0QBSc6tA=
=bWJP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 14 April 2003 13:03:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:17 GMT