RE: First Draft of summary of TAG issue abstractComponentRefs-37

Excellent!  Up to 9 options it is, probably more on the way as well.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Cotton [mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 9:10 AM
> To: dorchard@bea
> Cc: www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: RE: First Draft of summary of TAG issue
> abstractComponentRefs-37
> 
> 
> This seems to be missing some options:
>  
> a) Roy proposed just using a URI convention (slashes separate 
> namespace
> URI and component identifier)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0148.html 
> This email was specifically mentioned in the minutes of the 
> TAG meeting
> that assigned the issue:
> http://www.w3.org/2003/03/24-tag-summary.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
> And Roy is quoted as saying:
> "[Roy] 
> In the CMS world, a compound hierarchical document is no 
> different from
> a hierarchical directory system -- all names are hierarchies and the
> names are separated by "/" all the way down to the smallest atom of
> content. WSDL defines a compound document namespace rooted at its
> namespace URI. So, add a slash and define the hierarchy below the
> namespace URI according to WSDL."
>  
> b) Noah M has asked about using query strings (? separates 
> namespace URI
> and component identifier)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003Apr/0010.html (W3C
> Member only)
> 
> /paulc
> 
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
> Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 
> mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com
> 
>   
> 
> 
>