W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2002

Re: two failings of XLink

From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 23:37:40 -0800
Message-ID: <3D955C44.3030901@prescod.net>
To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
CC: www-tag@w3.org, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>

Jeni Tennison wrote:
>....
> So can you describe more formally what you class as a hypertext
> reference as opposed to a URI that is not a hypertext reference?
> 
> I guess that I've been assuming that any URI that points to a resource
> that should be retrieved/accessed/navigated to (as opposed to one that
> is being used as an identifier or as a base URI for example)
> represents a hyperlink.

I strongly agree with this definition. It is fairly concrete and solves 
a real problem in Web architecture wherein it is hard for 
vocabulary-agnostic processors to know what types of URIS are worth 
following.

  Paul Prescod
Received on Monday, 30 September 2002 14:11:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:11 GMT