- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 23:37:40 -0800
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- CC: www-tag@w3.org, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
Jeni Tennison wrote: >.... > So can you describe more formally what you class as a hypertext > reference as opposed to a URI that is not a hypertext reference? > > I guess that I've been assuming that any URI that points to a resource > that should be retrieved/accessed/navigated to (as opposed to one that > is being used as an identifier or as a base URI for example) > represents a hyperlink. I strongly agree with this definition. It is fairly concrete and solves a real problem in Web architecture wherein it is hard for vocabulary-agnostic processors to know what types of URIS are worth following. Paul Prescod
Received on Monday, 30 September 2002 14:11:43 UTC