> If I remember correctly I asked Steven Pemberton some weeks back on the > XForms Editors list to explain more lucidly the anti-XLink perception as far > as XForms goes. As I recall there followed silence on Steven's part. I > assumed, not unreasonably, that the case didn't stack up and that remains my > working hypothesis. Aha! I wondered why you hadn't responded. I assumed I had persuaded you! I did indeed reply, but apparently you missed it. > If there is a sound technical case to be made lucidly and succinctly for the > HTML WG's (and XForms WG's) opposition to XLink please feel free to make it > known. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2002Sep/0210.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Sep/0108.html Steven PembertonReceived on Thursday, 26 September 2002 16:40:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:43 GMT