W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2002

Re: My action item on Moby Dec, issue 14, etc

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:52:46 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020920114621.03c82ae0@127.0.0.1>
To: Michael Mealling <michael@neonym.net>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org

At 12:30 PM 9/19/02 -0400, Michael Mealling wrote:
>I think there's one concept here that we have to keep in mind: URIs are
>used in other places besides HTTP and web browsers. Many applications
>are using them in places where concepts of 'representations' and 'content
>negotiation' are not valid or are are least different from what the TAG
>has been considering. I agree with 90% of what's being said in this thread
>but I would like at least some verbage in there noting that the concept
>of 'representations' is a web specific concept and may not be universal
>to all systems that use URIs.

Assuming that RDF is typical of these kinds of application you mention...

If you regard an RDF description as a form of representation, I think the 
comments made about representations still apply.  I don't see any conflict 
between the viewpoints.

(I'll also comment that I think Tim Bray's recent comments are entirely 
consistent with what I understood Roy to have been saying about the role of 
representations.)

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Friday, 20 September 2002 07:19:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:11 GMT