- From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 14:50:52 -0700
- To: "Anthony B. Coates" <abcoates@TheOffice.net>, "www-tag" <www-tag@w3.org>
I sincerely hope it isn't considered part of the TAG's mandate to "co-erce" working groups that have domain expertise and know the related considerations into making decisions simply satisfy the hungering of external parties for a holy writ from the W3C. -- PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM Reality's the only obstacle to happiness.. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Anthony B. Coates [mailto:abcoates@TheOffice.net] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:37 PM > To: www-tag > > If TAG could co-erce the W3C XML Schema > WG into introducing a "schemaVersion" attribute which Schema > processors are required to respect, that would go a long way > towards clearing up this problem. > Much as it would be nice to have a less invasive solution, I > cannot think of one. > Can anybody else? > > Cheers, > Tony. > ==== > Anthony B. Coates, Information & Software Architect > mailto:abcoates@TheOffice.net MDDL Editor (Market Data > Definition Language) http://www.mddl.org/ > >
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2002 17:51:23 UTC