On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:29:08AM -0700, Tim Bray wrote: > Why not? This is my reading. I do *not* want to make payments, even > micropayments, as a result of doing a GET, without have done an explicit > prior authorization. And even then ... I don't want to be charged per GET, period. If I'm going to be charged per-page, it better be via POST, because I may be using a personal proxy that does things like invoking GETs on my behalf to keep my cache fresh. I think #4 is fine as is, but perhaps an additional example to cover the pay-per-page case would be worthwhile? MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.comReceived on Monday, 9 September 2002 15:29:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 13:52:38 GMT