- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 21:47:00 -0700
- To: www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
"Anthony B. Coates" wrote: > > ... > > I would venture that a URI identifies a resource, but that a complex resource > might contain portions that people equate with individual "things" or > "concepts". In that view, the resource would be a compound resource. So, for > example > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema > > refers to a compound resource (if any) that identifies the whole of W3C XML > Schema, while > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int > > identifies the integer datatype within W3C XML Schema. You say that that identifiers the "integer datatype". If we were forced to state that in a formal way we might say that "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int has rdf:type dataType" But the XPointer specification disagrees with you. The XPointer specification says that *if* the XML Schema document is XML then http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int has rdf:type XMLElement I think that this is a pretty fundamental disagreement. -- Paul Prescod
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 00:50:04 UTC