- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 18:41:32 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
connolly@w3.org (Dan Connolly) writes: >I told the RDF Core WG that this was already on the TAG >issues list, but when I look more closely, I think I should >raise a new issue (or agree with Simon's suggestion >to raise an issue). If the TAG wants to discuss architectural issues surrounding URI references and fragment identifiers in particular, I strongly recommend examining the discussion at: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2002OctDec /thread.html#39> One TAG member is already involved, and I think it's fairly clear that there's another fragment identifier-related chasm there. I don't have a clean way to describe this issue, I'm afraid - something to do with resources, representations, and their relationship to fragment identifiers. ------------- Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA http://simonstl.com may be my URI http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2002 18:41:33 UTC