W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Binary Infosets

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:18:12 +0200
Message-ID: <3DAAD224.7050508@expway.fr>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
CC: www-tag@w3.org

Chris Lilley wrote:
> 2) All other forms of binary infoset (including adaptive methods that
> allow arbitrary XML content and mixing of multiple namespaces) are
> thus also a bad idea. Disagree. They might be a bad idea or a good
> idea, insufficiently studied as yet.

I'm not sure one can reach a complete good idea/bad idea resolution. 
There are always (many) situations in which the infoset is better 
expressed as XML, and situations where that's not possible, or at least 
suboptimal.

My axes of reflexion tend to focus more closely on finding out 
when/where binary infosets are a good or a bad idea, and when they are 
found to be a good idea what can be done given the constraints they have 
to integrate them as well as possible into the Web architecture.

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Research Engineer, Expway
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
Received on Monday, 14 October 2002 10:18:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:01:54 GMT