W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2002

Re: deepLinking-25 : What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act?

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:39:37 -0700
Cc: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, www-tag@w3.org
To: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>
Message-Id: <52BB6603-DD6A-11D6-87CB-000393753936@apache.org>


> I would suggest adding (or merging) the following description to your 
> draft finding:

+1

....Roy

Received on Friday, 11 October 2002 19:17:49 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tim Berners-Lee: "Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links"
Previous message: David Orchard: "RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14)"
In reply to: David Booth: "deepLinking-25 : What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:44 GMT