- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 19:01:46 +0200
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- CC: www-tag@w3.org
Tim Bray wrote: > Robin Berjon wrote: >> while reading the webarch WD I came accross a point that surprised me >> slightly in section 3.3 (http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#formats-ideas). >> Point 8 mentions "Effect of Mobile on architecture - size, complexity, >> memory constraints. Binary infosets, storage efficiency." > > Er, chapter 3 of Webarch is *highly* uncooked. No discussion whatsoever > of these issues has yet occurred in the TAG context. Nothing to report. Ok, thanks. I mostly wanted to know if there were opinions floating around about that to mull over or discuss. > <personal-opinion>Binary infoset? Blecch. This is what XML exists to > prevent.</personal-opinion> -Tim It's just a content encoding, no different from, say, using gzip'ed XML over HTTP (only more efficient). I doubt XML exists to prevent gzip or any other content coding! :-) -- Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr> Research Engineer, Expway 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2002 13:02:24 UTC