Re: "duri" as a URI-based URN scheme

On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:28:03AM -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> In the old days we would have used URNs and moved on. Unfortunately now
> we have the mess that are URI and these philosophical yet meaningless
> debates will continually ebb and flow. I'm glad that at least now the
> TAG has realized that the discussion isn't productive and even more is
> inconsequential in the grand scheme of things. 

Well, although the TAG is putting the httpRange-14 issue behind them,
they do seem pretty keen on dereferencable URI, which would seem to
rule out URNs (until they're commonly dereferencable);

http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#pr-describe-resource

MB
-- 
Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@acm.org
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com