On Monday, October 7, 2002, 6:30:34 PM, Larry wrote: LM> I kind of like "now:" as a URI scheme in the same way that LM> I like "it:" ("What does it: mean? What ever you want it to mean.") LM> But I think it might be more useful to say exactly which LM> "now" you mean (the now now, or the now of last week?). Aha. Sorry, my comment into irc was perhaps a little terse. People were discussing URIs for tesources that were Not On the Web, and seemed to be using HTTP for that. I thought that was a little crazy, if its Not On the Web then why specify the protocol that you don't use? Hence my on-the-fly suggestion for a new protocol, defined to be non-dereferenceable, for things which are Not On the Web now:// I agree that there is ample scope for assuming this to be some sort of temporal scheme. My apologies for not providing further details at the time; it was not really intended to be a formal proposal. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.orgReceived on Tuesday, 8 October 2002 11:41:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:44 GMT