W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2002

RE: HTTP URIs need not be ambiguous, was Re: The case against URNs

From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 10:13:11 +0100
To: "'Jonathan Borden'" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, "'Paul Prescod'" <paul@prescod.net>, <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000101c26de1$c2876ec0$1fc8c8c8@mitchum>


> Jonathan Borden
> 
>  I am not sure what you mean by _fundamentally_ ambiguous. 

Jonathan,

Mike can surely speak for himself, but I think he means you can't tell
much by looking at that URI - you need a process to disambiguate.

This is fine, because URIs weren't designed to be self-contained bits of
information about something, they're just names for something - exactly
as OWL and RDF treats them. 

You need more information against the name, as you attest to in your
response - dereference the name and get back some disambiguating RDF. 


Bill de hÓra 
--
Propylon
www.propylon.com 

 
Received on Monday, 7 October 2002 05:14:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:43 GMT