> This Platonic Form of a resource can, however, leave us without a spoon > to bend, even given a representation of spoons, as soon as we cross into > the (perhaps) more concrete territory of URI references. Ugh, let's not. View-based fragments are not the same resource. The scene wouldn't be very interesting if he just picked up a warped mirror. Changing the interface (instead of what the interface produces) is a different topic. > I'd also recommend that the TAG read Dilbert today: > http://www.dilbert.com > > The reason for my pointing to that resource in this message will be far > clearer if you visit it on 4 October 2002 than it is likely to be on any > other date. Hey, no ambiguous use of identifiers -- that resource is "Today's Dilbert" . At least with this one they can purchase related items: http://www.cafeshops.com/cp/sotd.aspx?storeid=dilbert&date=10/04/2002 which, BTW, is also a classic example of how not to design a URI space. ....RoyReceived on Friday, 4 October 2002 18:09:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:43 GMT