- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 16:20:07 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/ "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com> was heard to say:
|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@textuality.com]
|> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 12:21 PM
|> To: WWW-Tag
|> Subject: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry)
|>
|
| [preface: I have no particular preference in the XLink / HLink / something
| else debate, I'm just trying to understand ... well, I have a preference for
| taking what we've learned and putting a very small but powerful subset into
| the core of XML 2.x, but no clue on what that would look like]
I'm a slow learner. Can I request another five years of experience before
giving an opinion on what XML 2.x should look like? Maybe another ten.
Be seeing you,
norm
- --
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | Everything in the universe goes by
XML Standards Architect | indirection. There are no straight
Sun Microsystems, Inc. | lines.--Emerson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE9nff3OyltUcwYWjsRAr+zAJ98OFaQMw1Xcg4PWbk5BAZBr4AuWACeJRWa
YwMUvisYnO0+dFWtOJiCZpY=
=3v0S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 4 October 2002 16:20:48 UTC