W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2002

RE: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links

From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@ingr.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 09:19:22 -0500
Message-ID: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0DF761@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
To: "'Norman Walsh'" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>, www-tag@w3.org

Here is a counter opinion (naturally).

HTML is the hypertext vocabulary for the web.
XHTML has hopes but so far, given what we use 
to create and maintain it, dim ones.  In other 
words, there just aren't substantial advantages 
to XHTML.  

HTML is here to stay.  As a result of the 
shortsightedness of that design, the evolution 
of the web is frankly, paralyzed.  Trying to 
push RDF into the gap has about a 80/20 chance.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Norman Walsh [mailto:Norman.Walsh@sun.com]


(2) the fact that XHTML, *the* hypertext vocabulary for the web, isn't going to use
XLink kills it. Dead. Finito. The proverbial cherubic soprano has
begun her song.

But that's just an opinion.
Received on Friday, 4 October 2002 10:20:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:43 GMT